大中华投资网

 找回密码
 注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
Midas上证50ETF+商品期权+期货+股票现货指导服务网站公众微信平台
查看: 1712|回复: 2

劳拉·泰森:美国的三大赤字

[复制链接]
发表于 2012-4-20 15:16:35 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本文来源于《财经网》 2012年02月08日 09:48
                             

美国的产出增长依然低迷,其经济还是面临三大赤字:就业赤字、投资赤字和长期财政赤字。这三大赤字的任何一项都不太可能在选举年得到解决


                                                                       
  新年伊始的一系列报告,让人相信美国的经济复苏似乎得到了巩固。就业岗位创造速度增加了;制造业和服务业的指标改善了;消费支出也强于预期。但是,不要高兴得太早。
  美国的产出增长依然低迷,其经济还是面临三大赤字:就业赤字、投资赤字和长期财政赤字。这三大赤字的任何一项都不太可能在选举年得到解决。


  就业赤字——逾1200万份职位

  尽管产出如今已高于2007年第四季度,但仍远低于劳动力和产能充分利用的水平。这个缺口——即实际产出和潜在产出间的差距——估计超过国内生产总值(GDP)的7%(超过1万亿美元)。
  产出缺口反映了逾1200万份职位的就业赤字——即回复到2007年经济顶峰时期就业水平,并吸收每个月进入劳动力市场的12万5000人所需要的就业量。就算2012年的经济增长如许多人预计的那样达到2.5%,就业赤字仍将存在——直到2024年才能消除。

  美国就业赤字的主因是总需求不足。占美国总开支70%的消费被高失业、低工资增长和房价及消费者财富大幅缩水所限制。去年最后数月消费水平的提升,是家庭储蓄下降和消费信贷大增的结果。这两个趋势都不健康,也不可能持续。
  失业率高达8.5%,劳动参与率只有64%,加上真实工资一直停滞不前,导致劳动收入占国民收入的比重跌至44%的历史新低。劳动收入是家庭收入的最重要组成部分,也是消费支出的主要推动力。

  在大衰退前,美国工人和家庭便已陷入困境。2000至2007年的就业增长率下降到只是前30年水平的一半。生产率的增长相当强劲,但远远超出了工资增长,而工人的平均真实时薪在下降,即使是有大学学历的工人也无法幸免。

  事实上,2002至2007年这段时期,是唯一一次在经济复苏期间出现家庭真实收入中位数下降的情况。此外,就业机会继续呈现两极化的态势,高收入的专业、技术和管理职位,及低工资的食品服务、个人看护和防卫服务的就业都在增长。
  相比之下,中等技能的白领和蓝领职位减少了,尤其是在制造业。压力重重的美国家庭不得不削减储蓄率、用房屋所有权作抵押借贷,以增加债务的方式来维持消费。这导致了2008年的房地产和信贷泡沫,及之后痛苦的去杠杆化过程。

  三大因素造成了美国劳动力市场的不利结构性变化:
  ·以技能为根本的技术变革,把重复的工作自动化,并提高了对至少有大学学历的受过高等教育员工的需求。
  ·贸易和外包带来的全球劳动市场竞争和融合,减少了就业岗位和压低了工资。
  ·美国作为生产和就业据点的竞争力下降了。
  技术变革和全球化在其他发达国家也造成了类似的劳动力-市场挑战。但美国竞争力下降却是其所推行的政策的结果。

  三大赤字息息相关须综合解决特别是,美国在三个帮助国家创造和保持高工资岗位的主要领域投资不足:技能与培训、基础设施及研发。美国政府在这些领域的支出还不到政府总开支的10%,而且这一比重还逐年减少。联邦政府目前能够以有史以来最低的利率借钱,而在教育、基础设施和研发领域,有很多项目都能带来较高的回报、制造就业、并提振美国吸引高工资岗位的竞争力。

  奥巴马总统提出了许多投资于美国国家竞争力基础的方案,但国会中的共和党却断然拒绝,认为美国的当务之急是财政危机。事实上,在2030年上升到不可持续水平之前,就算没有进一步的赤字削减措施,联邦赤字占GDP的比重也将在未来数年内大幅下降。

  美国确实面临长期财政赤字问题,上涨的医疗成本和老龄化人口是主要原因。但当前的财政赤字主要反映了税收不足——原因是低增长、高失业,还有在总需求依然疲软,需要投入新的刺激措施时,暂时性刺激措施却到期了。

  至少,为了保证美国经济今年能取得2.5%的增长,奥巴马所提出的削减工资税和失业救济方案应该延长到今年年底。这些措施能够为脆弱的复苏提供保险,又不会对长期财政缺口造成影响。


  那么,如何解决美国经济的就业赤字、投资赤字和长期财政赤字呢?
  决策者应该在财政政策上双管齐下,改善就业和投资赤字的情况,同时提出一个多年计划逐渐削减长期财政赤字。这一长期计划应该增加在教育、基础设施和研发上的开支,同时通过奥巴马医疗改革立法中提出的成本限制机制,抑制医疗开销的进一步增长。

  现在就通过长期赤字削减计划,但延迟到经济达到接近充分就业时才实行,可以防止过早的财政收缩把经济重新拖入衰退。事实上,立法实行这样的一揽子计划,可以解除投资者对未来赤字的担忧,加强消费者和企业的信心,从而增加产出和就业增长。

  对如何填补长期财政缺口应该马上作出痛苦的抉择,并在经济复苏后立刻推行。然而,在未来数年,财政政策的当务之急应该是就业、投资和增长。


  作者LauraTyson(劳拉·泰森)是美国总统经济顾问委员会前主席,现任加州大学伯克利分校哈斯商学院教授
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-21 20:54:06 | 显示全部楼层
Inflation: Myth and Reality
By Laura D'Andrea Tyson
Published: April 15, 1994






Fears of accelerating inflation have haunted the financial markets just at the time when the economy has turned in its best inflation performance in decades.


In 1993, the core indexes of consumer and producer prices (which exclude food and energy) registered their smallest gains in 20 years. Favorable trends are continuing this year: the annualized increase in the core Consumer Price Index over the past three months was 2.9 percent, the same as over the 12 months beginning in March 1993.


The Administration, like most private forecasters, predicts an uptick in inflation in 1994, as continued growth raises the utilization of industrial capacity and reduces unemployment. We certainly recognize the critical need to remain vigilant against inflation. The building blocks for a sustained expansion -- smaller Federal deficits, stronger business balance sheets, improvements in productivity, robust investment -- are in place. It would be a missed opportunity if the expansion suffered a premature end as a result of accelerating inflation.


So far, however, there are few signs of changes in the underlying causes of inflation. Rather, the financial markets appear to be reacting more to inflation myths than to realities.


Myth No. 1: Inflation can spike upward suddenly. Some commentators contend that inflation can strike at a moment's notice. History suggests otherwise. Since 1957, the first year for which core Consumer Price Index data are available, there have been only nine years in which the inflation rate increased by more than half a percentage point.


Five were oil shock years: 1973, '74, '79, '80 and '90. Oil prices can dramatically affect overall prices: core inflation jumped six percentage points from '73 to '74, and the '79 oil shock raised core inflation by nearly three percentage points in one year.


Since 1957 there have been only four years when there was no oil shock yet inflation increased by more than half a percentage point: '66, '68, '69 and '78. The first three were Vietnam War years, when the economy was overheated: capacity utilization was well over 86 percent and the jobless rate under 4 percent. The average jobless rate was considerably higher in '78, but that year was preceded by two years of rapid wage inflation, a trend we do not see now.


In short, it takes an oil shock or a severe overheating of the economy to produce a surge in core C.P.I. inflation. Neither appears to be on the horizon. Oil prices are low and likely to remain so at least for this year. And today's capacity utilization rates, in the 82 to 85 percent range, are well below the levels at which inflation might spike upward.


Myth No. 2: Price increases for industrial goods presage higher general price inflation. The price indexes of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia and National Association of Purchasing Managers increased noticeably in February and were blamed for fueling inflationary expectations. It is true that these indexes are somewhat correlated with the producer price index for intermediate goods -- say, industrial chemicals and wood pulp -- and other measures of commodity prices. It is also true that commodity prices, severely depressed in recent years, can be expected to rebound as the economy expands.


But over the past decade, the purchasing managers' index has, unsurprisingly, been a poor forecaster of changes in C.P.I. inflation. The managers' index is based on a narrow survey that includes only industrial companies, which account for a small share of overall economic activity; in addition, that index covers only purchases of industrial commodities.


Myth No. 3: Wages will soon accelerate because we are so close to full employment. One source of inflation could be an increase in the growth rate of unit labor costs -- that is, the cost of labor required to produce a fixed amount of goods. But unit labor costs have been decelerating, not accelerating, in recent years.


During 1993, unit labor costs increased by only 1 percent, compared with increases of 1.3 percent in 1992 and 2.5 percent in 1991. Over the past half year, they have fallen as wage changes have remained roughly constant in the face of increasing productivity growth. These developments lie at the heart of the good inflation story.


But are we on the verge of accelerating wage inflation, as some observers suggest? No. Even though the economy has created about 200,000 jobs a month over the past six months, wage growth has remained slow. Average hourly earnings increased only 0.1 percent in March despite significant employment growth. Over the past 12 months, average earnings increased only 2.4 percent.


The major commercial forecasters believe that labor market pressures do not push wage inflation higher until the unemployment rate, as measured today, falls to the range of 5.9 to 6.3 percent.


The Council of Economic Advisers reached a similar conclusion in its recent review of the relation between unemployment and inflation.


These views are reinforced by the economy's most recent experience. If labor markets were truly tight, there should be signs of mounting wage growth. But wage growth has been stagnant over the last year. Even when the unemployment rate falls to the 5.9 to 6.3 percent range, it is likely that wages will begin to drift upward only gradually. And strong productivity growth will continue to moderate growth in labor costs.


Myth No. 4: Rising import prices will heat up inflation. During the past year, the dollar has depreciated against the yen and import prices of Japanese goods are up about 7 percent. But Japanese imports represent only about a fifth of total U.S. imports and only about 2 percent of our gross domestic product. The prices of imports from the rest of the world are lower than a year ago, partly because the dollar has appreciated against most other currencies. Over the past year, prices of European, Canadian and other Asian goods are down about 1 percent, and imports from developing countries are about 4 percent cheaper.


Price increases for imports other than oil remain lower than the rate of core inflation, as has been true during the past five years. It is highly unlikely that import prices will be a source of accelerating inflation any time soon.


Myth No. 5: Higher gold prices mean inflation will increase. Gold prices have rebounded from the doldrums and are at their highest levels in about three years. But we have examined the relationship between gold prices and core C.P.I. inflation, and we find that there has been no correlation between the two since 1982. Developments like gold hoarding in China and political turmoil in South Africa buffet gold prices to such a degree that any causal link between gold prices and U.S. inflation seems hard to imagine.


In the absence of an oil price shock, it takes a sustained period of strong pressures on productive capacity to ignite truly inflationary conditions. Unless capacity utilization exceeds 86 or 87 percent, or the jobless rate drops substantially below its current level for a prolonged period, these conditions are not likely to develop in the near future. Instead, the economy seems well positioned to experience a decade-long phase of steady growth and modest inflation, much as it did from the mid-50's to the mid-60's.


Laura D'Andrea Tyson is chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers.
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2012-4-23 06:57:08 | 显示全部楼层
政客都是“短视的”,有远见、有魄力、有运气的政治家必然是少数,世间万事皆如此。就像投资者群体一样。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|大中华投资网

GMT+8, 2024-11-16 08:15 , Processed in 0.012050 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表